FeeVerify is proven on real production data from a tier-one cross-border payments business operating across multiple markets (blended and IC++ acquiring). From one month of data it re-costed more than 44 million transactions and traced a six-figure recurring variance to a single contract clause, 30 days after the data arrived.
That engagement read over 100 contract packages, many scanned, redlined or not in English, into 228 expected-fee rules, each with the excerpt it came from. The figures are from an anonymised engagement, and the proof page sets out what arrived, what was rebuilt and what was found.
The founders include payments operators who have spent decades inside the payment chain, in acquiring, issuing and processing. That experience taught them that payments billing rarely maps neatly onto a contract. The contract sets part of the price and the scheme fee schedules set more, while much of what was actually agreed sits in side letters, pricing files and emails, or was never written down. So FeeVerify breaks complex billing into its parts, from scheme components to acquirer markup, and rebuilds what each part should cost from every source available. Where a contract is silent, the gap is filled from those other sources and the rule is graded for confidence, so your team can see which terms rest on the contract and which were added.
FeeVerify rests on one belief from that work. What a business is billed should match what it agreed, and it should be able to prove it. The same picture then looks forward: each new month of billing is validated as it arrives, and the true cost of each provider and route gives a business clear economics for routing decisions and for negotiating better commercial deals.
